Friday, 27 February 2009

Found this old gibberish

Nothing changed on 9/11, although you might have heard other wise.

Many things are claimed to have changed. Such is the narrative structure of this theatrical event. The laws of physics, for one day only, took a new form. The elementary principles of justice, well, that's an altogether more thoroughgoing and long lasting change.

What these two things have in common is that they are unchangeable. Justice and true science are no respecters of person. It is the enemies of these concepts who seek to corrupt them, to replace them with different ideological constructs under the name of the old.

This is no starting point, but these are things we can be sure of. That makes this a good place to start an investigation. If things really didn't change on "9/11" then two areas of interest arise: 1) the continuities in events from before to after the great day and 2) the reason for these untrue claims.

The official story is untrue. It's a coverup and the natural assumption, which I have every intention of making and proving, is that those engineering a cover up have something to hide. Something rather big. Certainly bigger than incompetence. Much bigger than shooting down Flight 93, which could easily have been spun as an act of toughness and defiance. Maybe even a sacrifice, to appeal to the unclean subconscious pagan/telluric realms of the public mind.

The coverup, truth be told, was inplace (as are all good coverups) long before the event to be covered up happened.

So this is how I'm going to approach it.

Firstly, we need to look at the political reasons behind it. 9/11 as catalysing event for foreign policy manipulation. Secondly, we need to look at the ritualistic aspects which are integral to both the reasons for the attack and the oddities about its execution. Thirdly, the physical evidence and fourthly the individuals directly responsible for the attack and the infrastructure that made in possible.

A little thing: during the war in Iraq there was talk of a red line, crossing which would result in the unleashing of the tremendous and deadly Iraqi chemical arsenal. We know, of course, not only that it didn't exist but also that those saying it knew it didn't exist.

Little things

A little thing: during the war in Iraq there was talk of a red line, crossing which would result in the unleashing of the tremendous and deadly Iraqi chemical arsenal. We know, of course, not only that it didn't exist but also that those saying it knew it didn't exist.

The Roslyn is also a red line, of course. In Iraq the oil fields, which may have been big enough otherwise to despress the oil price and depose the Saudis as the oil kingpins, were delimited at the conference between the seven sister and mister five percent by a "red line".

A curious conjunction of films

Channel Five has chosen tomorrow to show the following films: Conspiracy Theory, The Wizard of Oz, Jumanji, The Manchurian Candidate.

Friday, 20 February 2009

Geroniimo's Bones!

Here we have what initially seems to be a straightforward story about Skull and Bones being sued by the descendants of the reputed original owner of the eponymous appendage becomes an extensive tour de force on the widespread ownership of body parts, especially colonial native body parts, by Masonic lodges.

Saturday, 14 February 2009


K-PAX: bluebird. Oswald/Jack Ruby is a bar called Bluebird. Bluebirds over the white cliffs of dover (28 weeks later projection of bio-hazard triquettra).

Evidence of Revision - MLK

My Brother Tom


evolution - shakespear - origin of life - origin of species - random mutation, rather than conscious autodirection - viral origins of some DNA - natural selection

Thursday, 12 February 2009


This island is made mainly of coal and surrounded by fish. Only an organizing genius could produce a shortage of coal and fish at the same time.
-- Nye Bevan, Daily Herald, 25 May 1945

Wednesday, 11 February 2009

Frank Timis and smack Lord Truscott

The following appeared in the most recent edition of Private Eye magazine.

What kind of man in Peter Truscott, one of the Labour lords at the centre of the Sundaty Times cash-for-amendments allegations?

Surprisingly, Truscott is working in partnership with a businessman twice convicted of possessing heroin with intent to supply. For he is a director of the Eastern Petroleum Corporation and African Minerals Ltd, both chaired and part owned by one Frank Timis (Eyes passim).

After fleeing his native Romania for Australia, Timis was convicted in 1990 for posessing heroin with intent to supply, and incurred a second heroin conviction in 1994. In 2002 the World Bank pulled out of a Timis-led attempt to dig for gold in Romania after campaigners had objected to plans to create massive cyanide-filled lakes. Then, in 2005, Timis claimed his oil firm, Regal, was sitting on a massive oil deposit off the Greek coast, and the share price soared. But the enormous reserves never appeared, investors did very badly and the London Stock Exchange is investigating to see whether there was "market abuse".

Timis probably hoped hiring a peer of the realm would bring respectability. Instead the noble lord had just brought yet more attention to Timis. Indeed, the Eye was alerted to Truscott's work with Timis by an anguished Sierra Leonean who wrote to Truscott to ask him to make sure Timis's company clears up the alleged asbestos spills on land near Freetown. As yet Truscott had not offered to help.

Saturday, 7 February 2009

Mind Control Triggers in Movies

A good primer. Good list of movies, too.

Current Liar