Comments on Arthur and the lost Kingdoms

I fundamentally disagree with the central tenets of Arthur and the Lost Kingdoms, but it's good to read something provocative every now and again. It's never reassuring, though, to come across a book with so many factual errors, one that even a layman like myself can spot.

Some of them are matters of interpretation or emphasis, others are things the author has picked up somewhere although there's no evidence to support them. The claim, for example, that the first people into Britain after the ice age were Aryans, Indo-Europeans, if you will. However he dates the end of the ice age in Southern Scotland to 7000BC (I wouldn't do so, but forget that), a time long before the group known as the Indo-Europeans started their diffusion. The first arrival of the Aryans probably doesn't predate 2000BC when they're known to have been involved in the building of the Shang dynasty in China and the Hittite Empire, the fall of Harrapa and Mohenjo Daro and the enclosure of the Basques and the rise of the Achaeans. The original European race was earlier and spoke a non-Aryan language, they were split by the Aryan inroads into the Pelasgians, Basques, Etruscans, the "Old Peoples" of the Hebrides the author mentions when commenting on the Barbarian Conspiracy.

The next thing I disapprove of, a matter of emphasis, is that he claims chromosomal studies show the genetic continuity of the British population from pre-Celtic times to the present day. This is based on the assumption that the Welsh have the same Chromosomes as the pre- Celtic peoples. Only a time-travelling geneticist could tell that, I'm afraid. Besides the mDNA and Y chromosome tests meant by this, similar to those which found the Falashas to be real Jews, show the English and the Welsh to be noticably different genetically, with greater similarities in those areas closer to the Welsh border. That evidence shows that most of the genetic material is Anglo-Saxon, not Welsh, and most by a very large margin in the east of the country. Many of the parts of the country tested were also badly chosen in my view, but don't get me started on that. He;s following the Frances Pryor fashionable error. I miss the days when reputable historians talked about volkerwanderungs. On the same subject he claims names similar to the Welsh self-name cumbyrig, such as Cumberton, show that common people were still Welsh in these areas. I think he's ignoring the fact that the vast majority of place names are English. The few Welsh names don't indicate a sea of Welshmen with a few English incomers but a few ghettoes of Welshmen in now-English territory. These were places like Exeter, Wroxeter, the second participle of whose names are derived from -saetan, and Old English term meaning an area of Welsh population under a loose English political suzerainity.

Not mentioned in the book was the seven boroughs, but i'd still like to point out that I don't believe the historians viewpoint that the Seven are the Five and York and Norfolk. I think it's far more likely the other two are Northampton and Bedford. These were similar to the Five in form of government, in that they were part of Mercia rather than having their own earls, and that they were ruled largely by popular assemblies called armies.

He goes into the ancient name Albion, derived from the latin of a Roman traveller but doesn't mention that the name Britain is evil older and mentioned by Pytheas.

Patrick was from Dumnonia in the West Country, not Rheged.

Y Gddoddin wasn't the first vernacular work in a European language.

King Mark, of Tristan and Isolde, wasn't a Scot. Inscriptions of his name have been found in the West Country.

Like the black nationalists, they are, claiming Cleopatra and Shakespear and so on were black.

Devon in the south east, Angles west of rheged, he has a shaky sense of geography.

English is the language in Scotland rather than Welsh although the Welsh of the south were conquered by Gaelic Alba, largely because a hefty chunk of the population of Souothern Scotland, Lothian in particular is descended from Anglians which occupied the area up to Edinburgh (English suffix) and beyond. As late as the 11th century Lothian was English and Cumbria Scottish.

Scots, he says, celebrate celtic victories over England, in sport and that, which he implies is some sort of Celtic solidarity based on common ancestry and culture (although as I say he claims the English are really nothing more than Welsh and the lowland Scots are really English, as I've pointed out). Really they celebrate any foreign victory over England, mourning for example the 2002 footballing defeat of England by Argentina (which was against us in the Falkland war fought to defend some Scots sheep farmers.

On the whole he's very provincial, obsessed with the area around his Scottish home town. Like the anti-diffusionists, he just looks at one area but it wasn't that simple. The Saxons were fighting in France on the Rhone while the Welsh were fighting Saxons and Picts.

The garrison in Britain was not the biggest in the Empire, not as big as that in Illyricum, Germany or Pannonia.

He spends most of his time trying to downplay the strength of post-Roman southern Britain. Vortigern, it's ruler, too. However he mentions a force of Saxons planted on the Wall of Hadrian which he seems to think was hired by the lowland Scots ro replace soldiers lost to Cunedda's mission to Wales. However the force was planted south of the Wall, and in that same place arose the kingdom of Bernice, one of the earliest Saxon kingdoms. Their position makes it more likely they were planted as a northern defence for Vortigern's lands rather than support for the men of the north. Their presence in the time of Germanus' visit, in alliance with the Picts no less, also shows that their presence pre-dated the Vortigern plantations. The Romans had a long tradition of hiring barbarians to fight their battles and guard their frontiers. Given their early appearance if they were hired by the northerners they had evidently gone for foreign help long before Vortigern had needed to, which doesn't seem much for the strength of the men of the north. It shows the strength of Vortigern that his reponsibilities stretch so far north.

Cunedda, Vortigern, Riothamus, Arthur, all more likely to be honorifics that proper names. Perhaps two or more of the above were the same person.

Tintagel mediterranean finds show the south was nice and romanised long after the north had largely reverted.

The men of the north were never known, as far as I can tell, mistakenly as the men of north wales. This wouldn't make sense. He claims this came to be believed when the northern welsh-speakers were forgotten and the Welsh welsh-speakers took the stories for themselves, but their were independent welsh-speaking kingdoms in the north into the eleventh century long after the Arthur legend was supposedly translated to Wales.

He's also pro-Pelagus and misrepresents the Theology to support the heresiarchs.

Our author also blames the Saxon-pict allliance on Vortigern, although it was decades before Vortigern's saxons arrived and very probably before Vortigern even took power. Even at that time his evidence for lack of central government in the south is very weak, in that it basically amounts to a visiting bishop not mention Vortigern (who may not have been around yet, as I say), and the Bishop (who had a prestigious roman military record behind him) being offered command of the army. He seems to disregard the fact that an army could be called together under a united command at a single location in the first place.

At that time the most likely authority was the old romanvprovincial council who would probably have been glad to have an experienced military man to lead their forces, especially a man of the cloth and the Romanitas. The appearance of a native army also shows that the supposed lack of military tradition in the
south is a fiction as it was from the local population that the roman military was recruited, and later from hereditary legionary families. There were over 30,000 Roman soldiers in Britannia, after all (assuming four standard legions and a normal complement of auxilia, the author claims 25,000). He also goes in for the
honorius letter supposedly rejecting a british plea for help, although this supposed reply is the only evidence anywhere for such a plea. It's more likely he was just acknowledging a fait accompli by the British gaining their independence, a contemporary history showing that following the Barbarian conspiracy locals in Britain got together to defend themselves and boot out the Roman governors and that the Gauls followed suit. The Romans were just admitting defeat and a loss of access and reach to this far isle. That history is quoted in the book itself, if you're looking for a citation. Zosimus, it is, and contemporary ishis term. Zosimus clearly refers to the expulsion of the Roman government by the local populace, but the authot insists on thinking of it as a collapse of central government after the Romans had pulled out.

My considered opinion is that Arthur could have come fron anywhere, other than Sarmatia, and that the Saxons allied with the Picts were brough over by the Romans to man the Wall. They went on the found Bernice and a tyrant called Vortigern eventually seized some power and invited Saxons to Kent as he couldn't trust his own subjects to obey him. Then came Arthur, from somewhere.

Perhaps a crisis, such as that of 443, brought Vorti to power.

He also claims the country was rapidly emptying of people, but not long after continental historians would be describing the country as so full that both Welsh and Saxon were leaving for France in large numbers. That only changed when the Romans evicted the Saxons from their Rhonish strongholds.

Earliest reference to Arthur is made in Y Gododdin, but it could hardly be anywhere else as hardly anything else survives from that time. Many things named after him everywhere, but this isn't made evidence that he was from somewhere other then Scotland.

Aesc from northern britain, more evidence of Saxons in the north before the south.

No missionary activity amongst the english by the welsh, he points out, although there was amongst the Picts and Scots. Does this mayhap indicate a greater enmity twixt Angle and Cymru? He argues that the real enemy was always the PIcts.

He thinks the word Tor is Gaelic, Q-Celtic, and proves Gaelic incomers in the Lothian area. I believe it's English and is certainly very popular in Derbyshire, Mam Tor, for example.

He believes rivers were chosen as battle sites by Arthur so he could easily outflank infantry enemies. Firstly, you fight where the enemy are, secondly rivers make good frontiers, thirdly rivers make good lines of advance for transmarine raiders like the Saxons and Picts, contrary to his suggestion the Saxons didn't commonly advance along Roman roads. Lastly the reason not to get caught near a river is that you might be caught with only part of your force across the water, as happened to the Norse at Stamford Bridge. Also, the Nennius battle list needs to associate battles with places and rivers happen to be good landmarks. So I don't think the preponderance of riverine battle names in the list is evidence of cavalry warfare.

That brings me to Nennius' battle list. He's almost got me convicend that the city of the Legion is York, I admit, but he's far too convinced of it. The rest, though, are rubbish. I read it a bit ago but for Mount Agned he hasno explanation so he finds an obscure manuscript that puts something more palatable in its place. He also decides Linnuis must be in Scotland because the river Dubglas must be Douglas, although he can't find a Linnuis while he criticises those who place it in Lindsey (Linnuis) because theyy can't find a Dubglas.

That'll do.

The Ultimate Evil

Some thoughts on Maury Terry's The Ultimate Evil

The son of sam letter: the supposed rejuvenating powers of blood are mentioned; "fair game" is mentioned, a Scientology tie-in; wemon, women/demons.

p151 - stolen heads and a severed head found behind Berkowitz's house.

p154 - Berkowitz linked to a spree killer called "Cowan", according to Downard a Masonic term meaning an outsider with dangerous knowledge, or a builder of dry-stone walling.

p176 - founder of the Process Church of the Final Judgement, infamous Satanic spin-off from the Church of Scientology, says "release the fiend that lies dormant within you for he is strong and ruthless and his power is far beyond the bounds of human frailty", Hyde to your Jekyll, the right-brain of the bicameral mind, the id, and so forth. Hitlers terrifying "new man", "satan is fear", he says, which is the little death.

The Jehovah/Luciferian split in the Process symbolic of the internal split between ego and id, right and left brain, etc..

Manson in prison, although this isn't mentioned in the book, was audited by Scientologists while in prison. The Process, of course, was a breakaway group from the Co$. Ron was a possible intelligence asset. Manson begged to be put into solitary confinement to keep the Scientologists away from him. Ron was, of course, in a devil cult (which he later claimed to have destroyed on behalf of the government, rather than disrupted by running of with the leader's money and woman). According to Ron Jr. Ron continued using aborted babies in satanic rites long after the foundation of Scientology, although this statement was
later recanted under duress. According to "L Ron Hubbard, Messiah or Madman" Hubbard raped at least one of the stable of pre-pubescent girls he kept around himself, known as "Messengers".

Hirschman was found dead with "Brother Tom" tattooed upon himself, which reminded me of the child-sex-abuse film "My Brother Tom".

Mansson, of course, was the original family name of Charles Lindbergh.

Alsace-Lorraine is the original home of the Alsatians, also known as German Shepherds, which were a favourite satanical offering. Alsace was also the home of the Strict Observance lodge of Masons and of the double-cross and supposedly the Montauk Alsace-Lorraine Time Archives.

Westchester Dartman, a personage going around the area of the Son of Sam cult's HQ shooting people with little metal darts. This preceded slightly the .44 caliber killings attributed to the Son of Sam. The DC Sniper of more recent times was also, according to the Fortean Times, preceded by a series of dart-shootings.

DA Gold, one of those responsible for accepting Berkowitz's "confession" turned out to be a paedophile, as did several other members of the cult. Drugs and porn, especially child porn and snuffs, seem to have been major revenue streams for the group, as they always have been for intelligence groups such as that behind Mo Atta.

Crowley: "After five years of folly and weakness, miscalled politeness, tact, discretion, care for the feeling of others, I am weary of it. I say today: the hell with Christianity, Rationalism, Buddhism, all the lumber of the centuries. I bring you a positive and primaeval fact, Magick by name; and with this I will build me a new Heaven and a new Earth. I want none of your faint approval or faint dispraise; I want blasphemy, murder, rape, revolution, anything, bad or good, but strong."

a fascinating thread on the linkages of things

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewtopic.php?t=8549&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=75

some random musings of james shelby downards carnivals of life and death

The man had, he said, a closed forskin, which he bloodily cut from himsrlf at a tender age. This is a coincidence.

Bell, one of the villains of the piece, he points out was from Edinburgh, he doesn't mention that it's famous for it's giant masonic cemetaries, and the midget graves found in Arthur's seat, the hill upon which the castle sits. These graves are mentioned in one of the Fort books, can't remember which or where.

Decapitation of sorcerors - Jayne Mansfield was in a car with one of her fellow disciples of Anton Szandor La Vey when they were in an accident and the driver somewhat lost his head.

The pharmakos, he says, was rolled down the side of a mountain and if lucky enough to survive was allowed ot wander away. That reminds me of an incident in my childhood when I was innocently cycling down the side of a hill only to find that my breaks had been cut. Luckily my head and some sharp rock broke my fall.

Found with the dayton witch: rice-burroughs mars books. Slightly incongruous, the musty calf-hide bound mystical tomes and the most modern of sci-fi (at the time). Hwoever this area, at that time, included HP Lovecraft, Arthur Machen and elrond Hubbard.

Some of his unfortunate experiences involved a Texas place called Brownsville. This place later became famous as home of the Brownsville/Matamoros death cults.

Interracial Klan sex. Only to be expected. The lef thand path is all about breaking taboos, especially sex taboos. Not surprising the Klan thought of interracial sex as taboo.

Cable voices. How do CB radio transmissions get picked up by cable TV?

William Cobbett said a house with a pig in the garden is a happy home. He certainly found this to be the case as the sacred beasts (according to the Egyptians, see "The Golden Bough" by Frazer) repeatedly saved him from masonic rhapscallions.

He also mentions a four pi-style dog sacrifice.

He mentions an odd gun, a rifle, he was shown. It had a narrow barrel, he said, but a breach for a large caliber bullet. These guns are made to provide the charge of a large caliber bullet and thus to fire a small caliber bullet at very high speeds with great accuracy over long distances. I've only prev iously heard of them being hand made for the Israeli special services and other highly specialist customers.

old quotes

This island is made mainly of coal and surrounded by fish. Only an organizing genius could produce a shortage of coal and fish at the same time.
-- Nye Bevan, Daily Herald, 25 May 1945

correct reaction to policing

Ashes to Ashes

Hypocritical oath

Israeli photo

like they're on a fucking log flume ride

E Gadarenes

A few thoughts as I read through Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare by Downard's apprentice, Hoffman (incidentally New Labour have been very big on the introduction of modern apprenticeships, as they call them, which I had assumed was a mere attempted allusion to their working class routes and the skilled trades, but with that Blair having created it all I could have been wrong). Reads like little dynamo. Mytical toponomy, syncromysticism.

Hoffman is outraged by the possibility of pig-human organs being put into human bodies, and seems surprised that it wasn't done with some sort of monkey rather than the genetically difficult pig, however we are remarkably similar to our porcine friends. Omnivorous. High body fat content. Not much hair. Symbolically, the pig is more human that the ape. Also there is the mystical and divine pollution of the holy pig, as Frazer points out the pig is now considered unclean by the Jews and friends not because of trichonosis and these other mterialistic concerns but because it was considered dangerous to tamper with the Otherworld by eating the sacred meat. Sacred but tasty, so I'll take my chances with the psychic tabus. And if I ever need a liver, I'll be happy to take one.

The talk of the creation of the beast-man abomination brought my mind, however, to the Stem Cell Swindle, a BBC radio documentary about children snatched fromt heir mothers breasts by Ukrainian doctors then butchered for their stem cells in the interests of selling those cells to rich white women at dodgy Caribean clinics. Stem Cell Massacre would have been a more accurate title.

Janus, Hoffa seems to think is deeply representative. A few Janus thoughts: "Janus in the modern world" by the Occultist and Egyptologist William Flinders Petrie, turns out not to really be about Janus at all. Janus, reflects Petrie, represents standing in the present looking to both past and future, thereby learning the lessons neccesary for peace. The only temples open in war time. The book, however, then goes onto a long social-darwinist and anti-socialist rant. Leave the work to perish, compassion is the vice of kings, and so forth. 21st Century Grail mentions a church in the south of England supposedly found with a Janus-featured font. Spirited Away, a Jap film, starts with a path and abandoned area full of janus-like two-faced head. Better than the three Baphomet was supposed to have, perhaps. Understanding is a three edged sword, you know. Hoff also talks about Sirius/Janus/duality/twins. Obviously brings to mind mirrors and their occultic and mind control implications.

There's something in the Bible about the devilry of a two-minded condition, but I can't immediately find it.

The sickle, Hoff says symbolises the bisection of the earth and heaven. Wall Street and Bolshevik Revolution, also claims the revolutions was nothing of the sort, not a communistic one at least. The two sides are one. Like Janus, two faces but one mind. Lee Harvey Oswald, he points out, worked both sides of the building housing both his FBI handler Bannister and his supposed Fair Play offices. Of course he also provides another East/West link through his time in the Minsk behavior modification centre and his KGB handler/wife along with his time hanging out at the Bluebird club and with his CIA handlers.

Swordfish, decent movie. Parental Alienation makes an appearance, along with some good prestidigitation and misdirection by the drug-dealing gov-terrorists.

Cremation of Care

A link.

More B5 and Primeval

Sheridan:	"Who are you?"
Justin:	"Now, that's really not important."
Sheridan:	"Who are you?"
Justin:	"Who decides that the workday is from 9 to 5, instead of 11 to 4? Who decides that the hemlines will be below the knee this year and short again next year? Who draws up the borders, controls the currency, handles all of the decisions that happen transparently around us?"
Sheridan:	"I don't know."
Justin:	"Ah! I'm with them. Same group, different department. Think of me as a sort of middleman, and the name is Justin. Come in, sit, sit. The tea is getting cold."

That from Babylon 5. This from Primeval, the scene which reintroduces Claudia Brown with a new personality:


Alice, who the fuck is Alice?

A few more pictures

The shatter-effect anomaly is hallucinated in a mirror, which I hardly need to point out the significance of.



Above: relief at the return of reality.

Above: shock at seeing mirror, below Cutter shows that men in glass houses should throw bullets to distress super-bats from the future:

Bab-a-lon 5

I found myself watching the second series of Babylon 5 today and noticed some thing I didn't the last time I saw it, many years ago when I was no more awake than anyone else.

Firstly a nice scene with G'Kar going on about weapons of mass destruction which wouldn't have meant anything at the time, but does a bit.

Secondly the "sleeper" programme of Psi Corp, designed to make agents with sleeper personalities. Supposed to be drugged and brainwashed, then left with their normal personalities until triggered by a code word which eliminates the cover personality and replaces it with the real, covert personality which has been spying.

Going back to Primeval, they've been showing it again on ITV2 and I've had a chance to take some mind-shattering screen caps:


That's the woman who ends up becoming someone entirely different due to interference in the past. I'll try to get the ruby slippers pic when that episode's on.


That's the two female characters with faces shown in shards of glass, as seen at the start of every episode.



From the start of the last episode, "previously" in the previous episode. Big slivers of glass coming down from the skies.

A couple of things Virutal Government misses

Virtual Government by Alex Constantine, that is. He mentions Heaven's Gate, but doesn't mention the 9/11 link. Mentions alien abductions as a mind control front, doesn't mention CDB Bryan's abduction book (his dad was a MC scientist, of course).

Sinister Forces Book Two: A Warm Gun, mentions that the OTO call the successors to Crowley Caliphs, but doesn't mention that the Ku Klux Klan call their holy book the Kloran.

Skull and Bones

Very good ray post on the goddess-worshipping of skull and bones: here.

I see ld has been reading Dingwall

Following on from the mentions of mirrors previously: Sirhan claimed "my mirror" told him to do it. His alter, perhaps. That was mentioned in RFK must die, which also has a repeated shot of some bloke with one half of his face in darkness. Sometimes his face is shown on each side of the screen, bothly with the out-facing side lit. In The Three Hostages the character Dominic Medina uses his own half-lit face to hypnotise people in a darkened room. The author of that, of course, was Buchan, the Scots aristocrat and spy/propgandist.

Blind Boyard

Start with the obvious. Why Blind Boyard. What they say about Boyard is that he, poor horse, was chosen by a Templar to go out to Boyard's leap, I assume it was called something else at the time, and face off a witch. Well, the legend says one of the not-so-poor Knights of Christ and Temple was off to face the witch and could find a horse brave enough to accompany him due to the old hag's hideous visage, but there were plenty of knights and it isn't too far to walk. So Bayard the wonder horse, called blind Boyard because the knights though only a blind horse could stand the sheer horror of the old woman's features carried the knight into battle with the poisoner of wells. The name Boyard's leap comes from the next part of the story, that the witch scratched the poor horse on the arse with her talons and it leaped some prodigious distance, leaving it's hoof marks of the place of landing. Horses can be skittish, or so I'm told. Herodotus believed they were scared of donkeys so jumping at a demoniac's nails being driven into your rump would be par for the course for our equine friends.

I'm drifting.

I have, in fact, been to Temple Bruer, one-time home of our horsey hero. One of my relatives lived there long before I was born. I've never been to the remains of the Templar preceptory itself, not that I remember anyway, but I hardly remember my visit to the place. It belongs to some farmer now who doesn't want people walking all over his land. I heard interesting things that day, from my formerly resident relative, although my normally reliable memory refuses to yield most of them. There are seven of something in Temple Bruer it tells me that he said, but it neglects to tell me of what. Houses, perhaps, or roads leading from the village. Google earth doesn't show either of these to be noticably the case. Why such a thing should have been mentioned to a visiting young boy who has been dragged out into the country by a relative to see one of the many villages he'd lived in isa matter for debate itself. Incidentally one of my earliest memories is of said relative using a screwdriver to undo the lock whilst I was having a bath.

That's probably a road we don't want to go down, but that still leaves six more to look at.

Brother, Where Art Thou?

There'sa very good reason that humans are the most dangerous game. I used to think the focus given to movies by some of the internet conspiracy community was just a dead herring, as Baldrick might say, but now I'm not so sure. I'm thinking there is a great deal of symbolism in these movies and TV programmes. This sort of thing scares off the novitiate, and the ardent materialist alike. Hugh Manitee Wins (note 1) on the rigint boards calls it woo. I had assumed this was meant onamatopaeically to represent a mad-sounding noise, but he uses it as an acronym meaning wonderment occluding objectivity. He's wrong though. We and our enemies live in a world fundamentally different to that perceived by the masses. I'd like to go for the bells and whistles myself, occlude some objectivity and brainwash people with my HTML skillz, but I'm not good enough at it to do that. The world might not be a wonderful place but its a place full of wonders. Not this website, though, so don't expect much.

I've been especially sceptical about the idea of Keyword Hijacking, but old Hugh might be onto something there too. I was reading David Leigh's "The Wilson PLot" and saw two names that are familiar, and espeically relevant given the accusations against Star Trek made by both Hugh and Fritz Springmeier, along with the theory that Roddenberry was in Contact with the Nine.

The names Were a Leonard McCoy who was then involved in CIA subversion of European democracy, not the doctor of the original starship Enterprise, and Patrick Stewart who was a wheel-chair bound interrogator and pinko-hunter for MI5. The captain of the Next Generation of the Enterprise was played, of course, by a then-obscure Thesp called Patrick Stewart who later appeared in The X-Men in a wheel chair.

The above film is one I once saw on Channel 4, many moons ago, which I was impressed by at the time. Haven't seen it since, not even up here on the web, but perhaps it's best to go by those bits which struck me enough to still be in my memory several years later.

Firstly, I don't think I saw the beginning of the film. I remember it being very clearly divided into chunks, on the one hand the forest idyll where the abused children find solace with each other, presumably representing the idealised world presonailities are put into when the desired personailities are conjured out during episodes of abuse. On the other hand there is the every day reality of terror and upset, abusive parents and of the two of them having no public association.

It's also a very dismal film in which the idealised periods are clearly nothing more than a period away from the inevitable horror. It's the opposite of the cheery film "The Straight Story", an American film about an old man who rides a lawnmower across America and finds friends at every turn, although the audience would like to see him brutally murdered. What happened to giving the audience what they want? What happened to sex and blood-soaked, intestine munching violence? On that topic there's another film that comes to mind, called a History of Violence with Viggo Mortenson, from the Lord of the Rings films and the 90s remake of the classic Vanishing POint. History of Violence, in which there is also the woman from Thankyou for Smoking (deaturing the initiiation of a child into the PR cult) as the wife who refuses to believe her husband is a blood-stained mafia hitman on the run from his brothers under the skin. History of Violence in which the lead character has successfully adopted a whole new persoanlity until his Delta persoanlity comes out and he goes on the rampage eliminating his enemies in droves. That's more like it. that's what we like to see. Bit of sex, lots of violence. That's what got Hollywood where it is today.

British films, like My Brother Tom above, generally go the opposite route although there are exceptions such as "Going off Big Time" in which a villain recounts the tale of his criminality to a lawyeress he's befriended then borrow her car and gets his brains blown out by a young boy he had sexually belittled.

MY Brother Tom also features a part-domesticated hedgehog being burned as the result of a lover tiff, often the gruesome fate of the pets of abused children, and ends in the very un-Hollywood fashion of the hero throwing himself in front of a train, the girl being thrown out of his funeral by the father who abused him on the grounds that they didn't know each other and his ghost coming back to prevent her suicide. Not many Hollywood films like that. Maybe something by David Lynch. The only suicide film from Hollywood that comes to mind is Falling Down, in which Michael Douglas does what many people do in computer games, he walks through a city disarming anyone who attacks him and subsequently taking their weapons to add to his arsenal, ending up with a rocket launcher. End: Suicide by cop. But that doesn't feature all the aspects of Omega programming that My Brother Tom does.

My Brother Tom somewhat resembles the book/film Secret Garden in one respect, namely the eponymous secret garden in which the ego can hide while reality is too harsh for childish intellects to face.

A twist: the film identity with John Cusack. A man discovers he is an alter in the mind of a murderer. His only hope is to kill the murderer-alter and take over the body. In the end he and the one he thinks is the murder kill each other, the love interest female alter think she's the only survivor until the kid we thought had been blown up comes back. Turns out the kid was the murderer. Hope that doesn't ruin it.

Intermission

Too many movies. Let's have some music.

Don't be reading too much into that. Mind you, the emos have something called the emo fringe, at least according to an emo colleague of mine, which covers one eye, a standard MK trope.

Back to business

What the hell's this monster?:

Answers on the back of a postcard. I saw one of his television series not at all lond ago, Magnetic North. Quite interesting in places, ends with him stepping back into a darkened doorway which he has made it quite clear is symbolic of the entrance to the womb.

Sorry, I need some more music after that. I'd give you the Ting Tings, but they don't like embedding. Look up their YouTube channel, though, the front page has a song which features the words "You never alter". Certainly grabbed my attention.

Anyway, there's always Jasp:

As the man says, if you're thinking of switching over, forget it.

Okay, that's not music, try this:

Onward, then.

May God Strengthen the hands of the righteous

A last word, I think, on thr movies. I wouldn't but I was just watching the demented Cremaster Three. I think someone like ray or pseudoccultmedia might be more attuned to it than I, but I cant recommend it.

True Lies is more my sort of thing, explosions and Eliza Dushku hanging off a Harrier jump jet, not allegorical modern dance.

Florida was the place chosen for the exemplary nuclear explosion in True Lies, which provides a nice segue into the next topic: the Florida 9/11 circus. I'm no Daniel Hopsicker, I'm afraid, but I notice something odd in Welcome to Terrorland. Hopsicker is interviewing Amanda Keller, the surprisingly obscure stripper girlfriend of Atta, the supposed 9/11 ringleader. She telling him that Atta did coke, associated mostly with Germans, had a small penis, was a foot fetishist and all the rest and it's just slipped in that Amanda Keller worked ina strip club used for sexual blackmail operations on Florida figures, jjust the sort of thing the CIA speicalises in, as testified by Paul Bonacci who was one of the Boystown/Craig Spence victims.

This is a place where the guards are former rozzers, the clientele are the elite of international terrorism and the manager is making his money by filming his cadre of lesbian whores cavorting with local politicos.

This is the sort of thing Hopsicker never delves into. In Barry and the Boys he casually mentions that Barry Seal and David Ferrie had photographic memories. Of course he doesn't mention that this is a classic sign of TBMC, indeed that's the sort of thing that never gets mentioned by the hero-reporter. Everyone has their limits, the point which their beliefs won't go beyond. Someone like Palast can accept that Bush isn't acting in the best interests of his nation, evenin his own head. But he can't accept that the American government might spend their time dealing drugs and attempting to control peoples minds.

TO be honest I don't think Hopsickers' books would have gained anything by mentioning these things, buthis little allusions are good material for the rest of us to work from anyway.

Mind Control, especially the ritual abuse of children for the purposes of Trauma-Based Mind Control, is the great taboo that very few people will accept. People are more willing to accept that someone is lairy of mirrors because they've been abducted by aliens than that they might be victims of mind control, like Candy Jones.

That could be a coincidence, as could the millenia long belief that mirrors are the portal to another world, a belief also held about other reflective surfaces such as lakes and pond, into which offerings were thrown to the Gods of the underworld and into which the kings of el Dorado supposedly swam while communing with other realms.

I don't really believe in co-incidence. See the co-incincidence theorists guide to 9/11. Also see this film, taking particular notice of the bits relating to the elder George Bush, his lack of imagination and the Zapata/Barbara stuff:

I don't know who made that or what their agenda might be, I've certainly become suspicious of everything and everyone (although "become" implies this was once not the case, wrongly), but the film stands up on it own merits.

I seem to be rambling.

The point of this website is merely to arrange my thoughts and records. I believe that's what I started out with the intention of saying.

Note 1:

Found this old gibberish

Nothing changed on 9/11, although you might have heard other wise.

Many things are claimed to have changed. Such is the narrative structure of this theatrical event. The laws of physics, for one day only, took a new form. The elementary principles of justice, well, that's an altogether more thoroughgoing and long lasting change.

What these two things have in common is that they are unchangeable. Justice and true science are no respecters of person. It is the enemies of these concepts who seek to corrupt them, to replace them with different ideological constructs under the name of the old.

This is no starting point, but these are things we can be sure of. That makes this a good place to start an investigation. If things really didn't change on "9/11" then two areas of interest arise: 1) the continuities in events from before to after the great day and 2) the reason for these untrue claims.

The official story is untrue. It's a coverup and the natural assumption, which I have every intention of making and proving, is that those engineering a cover up have something to hide. Something rather big. Certainly bigger than incompetence. Much bigger than shooting down Flight 93, which could easily have been spun as an act of toughness and defiance. Maybe even a sacrifice, to appeal to the unclean subconscious pagan/telluric realms of the public mind.

The coverup, truth be told, was inplace (as are all good coverups) long before the event to be covered up happened.

So this is how I'm going to approach it.

Firstly, we need to look at the political reasons behind it. 9/11 as catalysing event for foreign policy manipulation. Secondly, we need to look at the ritualistic aspects which are integral to both the reasons for the attack and the oddities about its execution. Thirdly, the physical evidence and fourthly the individuals directly responsible for the attack and the infrastructure that made in possible.